Re-Imagining Ecology

From CBC Radio: Ideas with Paul Kennedy
Thursday August 25, 2016


“Three experts in urban and environmental conservation discuss an ecological approach to the restoration and preservation of both wilderness and cityscapes. Sophia Rabliauskas of Manitoba’s Poplar River First Nation worked to protect 43,000 square kilometres of Boreal forest. Glen Murray supported urban sustainability, first as Mayor of Winnipeg and now as Minister of Environment in Ontario. And Julian Smith is Dean of Faculty at the Willowbank School of Restoration Arts.”

Hear here.

Related websites:

Leave a comment

Filed under ecologies, Urban Ecology

Romare Bearden’s Mecklenburg Autumn: Heat Lightning Eastward


Cut, paste, repeat: thanks to dmf at Synthetic Zero.

Source: Romare Bearden’s Mecklenburg Autumn: Heat Lightning Eastward

Leave a comment

Filed under Art

Mystery and Murder at Brushwood

Go now. See Doug Fogelson’s On Climate exhibit at Brushwood Center, Ryerson Woods (Deerfield, IL), ending September 4th.  The exhibit features photographs, photograms, an outdoor sculpture, and an …

Source: Mystery and Murder at Brushwood


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Doug Fogelson – Destructive Transformations



“Doug Fogelson’s inquisitive practice in photography echoes the experimentation that was central to the medium’s inception. For the better part of 20 years, Fogelson has consistently produced seductive imagery while investigating unsettling issues (e.g., climate change).”

Source: Doug Fogelson – Destructive Transformations

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Objects, OOO

@billmckibben Aug 17 USA this a.m.: 80k evacuated in CA fires; 40k homes damaged in LA flooding; 100s protesting NDak. pipeline. We’re losing, but we’re fighting

Might have to make that our new motto “We’re losing, but we’re fighting”

Source: @billmckibben Aug 17 USA this a.m.: 80k evacuated in CA fires; 40k homes damaged in LA flooding; 100s protesting NDak. pipeline. We’re losing, but we’re fighting

Leave a comment

Filed under Climate Change, politics

Fossil Fuel Divestment in a Nutshell

The following informal analytical summary is based on secondary research conducted for Chicago 350. I  reviewed a variety of academic and media articles, and have cited select accessible sources.

A great deal of information about fossil fuel divestment is available on environmental activist sites.  Divestment campaigns are not ultimately targeted to the converted, however.  Almost everything published betrays a bias.  And the financial stakes for governments and institutions seem high, in the wake of the 2008 economic crisis.  While conducting fresh research to orient myself to this still  controversial issue, I found articles that supported the financial case for divestment and articles that argued against it. For this reason I concluded that short-term investment arguments are not the most persuasive. More compelling are the long-term economic arguments and projections. On one hand, investing is all “speculation,” but on the other hand, public opinion and policy will likely stigmatize fossil fuel industries and affect their market value. Technological and economic trends also suggest that alternative energy will soon replace fossil fuels as a primary source of the world’s energy.

Alternative energy costs are declining steadily, as technology progresses and market share increases, and these costs are already competitive with fossil fuel costs in some contexts. The long-range outlook for fossil fuels, conversely, is grim and most experts are confident that the fossil fuel market is peaking.[1] A large portion of existing reserves will become “unburnable” “stranded assets,” due to government policies and market factors influenced by climate change.[2] Indeed, government policies that count on exploiting all existing reserves clearly contradict existing climate-change goals and commitments.[3] Some experts argue that investment banks are blind to the risk, and less concerned than fossil fuel companies, because they are primarily interested in generating fees.[4]


Number Image – Fossil Fuel Subsidies 5x more than Renewables  by Alisa Singer

From a broader perspective, legislators and citizens should be informed about and concerned with the various economic implications of continuing to invest in fossil fuels. The fossil fuel industry is much more heavily subsidized than the renewable energy industry, which makes it less economically efficient.[5] Continuing to invest in fossil fuels thus drains national and regional resources in general. Also governments should invest in clean energy jobs and training before the “carbon bubble” bursts, to ensure a smooth transition in terms of education, employment, and infrastructure adaptation, all of which have short- and long-term economic implications.[6] As in most environmental debates, citizens and legislators tend to be shortsighted. If our current economic woes are a result of previous shortsighted policies, then reacting in the same manner now only passes the buck to the next generation and increases the problem.

Image and image data sources:

[1] “The World Nears Peak Fossil Fuels for Electricity”

[2]“Carbon Bubble & Divestment Trouble: An Analysis | The JEI” ; “Most Fossil Fuels ‘Unburnable’ Under 2C Climate Target”

[3] “Most Fossil Fuels ‘Unburnable’ Under 2C Climate Target”

[4] “How Should Investors Manage Climate-Change Risk?” ; “Investment Bank Blindness to Risk in Fossil-Fuel Sector”

[5] “Energy Subsidies”

[6] “Divesting from Fossil Fuels: How Cities can Help Solve the Climate Crisis”


Leave a comment

Filed under Climate Change, commons, Policy


By: Lori Duchrow·Rhinelander, WI

Re-posted from Center for Humans & Nature.


Image, added by Environmental Critique, “low tide” by Randall Honold at dylar addict.

“Everyone on this earth is entitled to clean, safe drinking water. Clean drinking water is not a commodity to be used for profit, and laws will be necessary to ensure corporations cannot control the water supply. Nestlé, for example, is already trying to do just that. Legislators must do everything possible to protect our water.  Those that deny climate change and its impact on our air and water, have no business in political office. We have to take action now before it is too late.

The powers that be in Wisconsin, our Governor Scott Walker in particular, are destroying our waters at a very fast pace. Expansion of agri-business, rolling back environmental protections, restricting the powers of the DNR, reducing funding for research—these are just a few of the things that have occurred in just the past year.  In February, legislation was quietly signed that enables owners of high-capacity wells to replace those wells at any time, with larger wells of any size without state oversight. This is already having an impact in Portage County.”

Read more of this post here.

See complete discussion, “What are our Moral and Civic Responsibilities to Water?” here.

Leave a comment

Filed under commons, politics, Uncategorized